Love Him or Not, Bill Maher Fits the Twain Prize Mold

When news leaked earlier thus month that the committee—or whatever it is—that selects the annual Mark Twain Prize for contributions to American humor (and society) had chosen Bill Maher as this year’s honoree, Donald Trump was stunned.

And not in a good way.

But it really is happening—with Trump’s apparent blessing, though he’s not expected to attend. That kind of contradiction is par for the course with Maher, who remains a somewhat surprising choice.

That’s not because Maher lacks the credentials. He’s been delivering topical, politically pointed comedy on television for more than 30 years, across multiple networks. Those are legitimate qualifications.

Still, Maher is a more hot-button choice than many past recipients—the Carol Burnetts, Bob Newharts, Steve Martins, and Lily Tomlins of the world.

That status extends well beyond Trump’s very public disdain. Maher has drawn blood in plenty of directions over the years. Trump is just his most prominent—and perhaps most persistent—adversary.

Their history goes back a ways. Trump, who does not suffer comedians gladly, has hurled a steady stream of insults at Maher—so many that Maher himself has catalogued them. At one point, Trump even sued him. It involved an orangutan and $5 million. (Trump eventually dropped the suit.)

For his part, Maher predicted on his show that Trump would refuse to accept a loss in the 2020 election, and that violence from his supporters could follow. He got that right.

The two later shared a meal at the White House, after which Maher said he found Trump more appealing in person.

But if Trump thought Maher would stop treating him as a comedy target after their meeting, he was wrong.

As recently as Friday, Maher was still at it: “Whenever Trump names stuff after himself, it never really works out. I mean, you think about the Atlantic City casinos, Trump University, Don Jr.”

Even with those zingers, Maher has at times been more tempered about Trump since that dinner, occasionally even sounding like a defender—most notably in backing Trump’s efforts to obliterate Iran.

That has not slowed Trump’s attacks, which have ranged from the generic—“lightweight, totally shot, a crazy maniac”—to the more vivid: “a pathetic, bloated sleazebag.”

Maher, for his part, seems to relish the exchange. Responding to Trump’s opposition to his Twain selection, he said Friday: “Keep the game going, baby. Get it off your chest, Big Man.”

All of which reflects the kind of “engagement”—Maher’s word—that has long defined his public persona.

And that persona is central to why he’s an unusual—but not inexplicable—choice for the Twain Prize.

Maher clearly wants the honor. “I think I’m finally getting one,” he said, referencing his long history of Emmy nominations without a win. (Though he did win once as a producer.)

The Twain Prize is something else. It’s one of the most prestigious honors in comedy, and the accompanying Kennedy Center special—featuring peers celebrating the honoree—can be exceptional television. Last year’s ceremony for Conan O’Brien was a prime example.

What makes this year potentially different is what has always made Maher distinctive: he is not a conventional, mainstream comic.

He is a contrarian.

He takes strong, often unbending stands on issues many comedians avoid—religion, cancel culture, even children.

On this past weekend’s Real Time, that included a line about baby pictures: “I don’t have kids; I don’t like kids; I don’t wanna see kids. So, to me, this is the equivalent of sending me an unsolicited dick pic.”

It got a big laugh—along with a dose of “clapter,” a staple of Maher’s show. His audiences can sound especially enthusiastic. Not necessarily fake—just emphatic. And jokes that provoke outrage still have their place, if they’re funny.

Comic style is a matter of taste. Maher pushes boundaries—in subject matter and, at times, in taste.

That has alienated some and gotten him into trouble. But he remains on the air—and still thriving.

And while he often delivers opinions in absolutist terms, dismissing opposing views as affronts, Maher has shown a willingness to evolve on certain issues.

Just not on kids. Or religion.

Mark Twain, it’s worth noting, also took aim at organized religion, even as he maintained personal belief. He once said his greatest work was Joan of Arc—a claim few would make today, or even remember.

There is nothing in the Twain Prize criteria that requires honorees to resemble Twain in style or sensibility. Is there much of Twain in Bill Murray or Kevin Hart—beyond the fact that they’re funny?

It’s the same with Bill Maher. He stands in front of audiences and elicits laughs. Mark
Twain did that. It’s fair to claim Twain was the first real stand-up comic. Of course, he
did a bit more than that.

But honoring a veteran stand-up and television host makes sense on a basic level.

And honoring one who has built a career skewering politicians, frauds, and public figures—much as Twain did—may make even more sense.

That has been Bill Maher’s path.

Now it leads him to Washington—to be celebrated, and perhaps to take a few more shots from the house up the street.

Get stories like this in your inbox: Sign up for LateNighter’s free daily newsletter.

6 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. SO FUCKING WHAT?!! says:

    Whatever it was that made Bunghole Bill Maher worthy of the Mark Twain Prize, happened a long, long time ago, IF THAT! Today, he nothing but a whiny assed contrarian dispensing personal grievances and false outrage, as well as being a humorless dick!

    The only reason he got that award is because no other satirist and comedian out there would accept that, with Drumpf’s hand picked committee of sycophants and suck ups choosing for him! And Bunghole Bill Maher is that big a toxic narcissist that he would accept that, no questions asked, because his delicate ego demands it!

    Bunghole Bill Maher has become Drumpf’s bitch! And he’s too fucking stupid to realize that!

  2. Orrin says:

    Thank you. You don’t have to like Bill Maher but if you Deny his appeal, You are likely an out of touch person who is way too far into identity politics

    1. What appeal? says:

      He’s a narcissistic douchebag that’s trying lamely to be something different, yet doesn’t know what the fuck he’s talking about most of the time! Not even other comedians and late night hosts find him appealing!

      If it wasn’t for his new buddy Drumpf and his hand picked board members, Bunghole Bill wouldn’t be accepting the award!

  3. mac20 says:

    I still watch his monologue, the comedy bit in the middle, and New Rules….nothing with his discussions or interviews which are cringe

  4. Griffanzo Taliesin says:

    Going forward, please refer to it as what it has become, the trump Twain Prize.

  5. M/A K/M says:

    It’s odd that the author purports to be a dispassionate inquisitor and not just forget that his support of the unprovoked aggression against Iran has nothing to do with “meeting Trump” but his well-documented, decades-long islamophobia emanating from his zionazism (yes, I gather what he got once fired for*), but even to simply investigate why is his show the one-&-only HBO Original output they have started putting out quite an uncharacteristic disclaimer for. They never did for any other programming, and they still don’t do for any scripted programming in this day-&-age, either. But then.. There’s something about HBO executives keeping him on as commitment for that eons-ago cancellation and then conversely expiating for it not by keeping on Mr John Oliver (and there’s something about how the premium cabler’s PR micromanages successfully for both to not blow up at each other, one far less fairly than the other — except for the one time ‘Willy Billy’ couldn’t resist badmouthing ‘Last Week Tonight with John Oliver’ and the latter accurately shot back about him being “intellectually bankrupt”), but in fact commissioning one unscripted one-&-done project after another showing facts on the ground in the historic Palestine challenging general, rest of mainstream media narrative for decades since his show started. It’s quite sad, actually — HBO comes across like, as I keep saying, “retirement-fund [home]” by keeping an average conservative media (and a bit like liberal media on matters like Iran, Palestine and anything on Islam generally)-esque charity case on. Even his “apatheism” (a characteristically narcissistic way to call: agnosticism) is just like Hollywood nepo baby Sam Harris (no honorific!)’ “atheism” and every other pop-atheists blindspot, on Judaism. The less we talk about his own podcast, and documented case about very worrying trends, no, not interviewing while intoxicated which is already questionable, but even sexualising some late-tween/early-teen youth. Surely, he isn’t in favour of youth rights on his show, he in fact “hates” them — no? So.. Is he in favour of “boy/girl lovers”?

    *For saying accurate stuff like the assailants flying the plane (according to the official story) into the Twin Towers were “not cowardly” whereas the State assailants (“soldiers”) dropping bombs from the distance are soon after that morning across Acela corridor, DISNEY-owned ABC cancelled his HBO co-produced show owing to widespread advertiser broadcast amidst the dot-com bubble burst.