CBS is finally putting some official numbers behind its late-night pivot.
After ten months of defending its decision to end The Late Show with Stephen Colbert as “purely financial,” the network went on the record Thursday with figures network execs had previously only circulated privately: CBS says The Late Show was losing roughly $40 million annually, while Byron Allen’s new time-buy deal for the 11:35 p.m. hour will generate $15 million in profit.
That, the company says, amounts to a $55 million swing in late night.
“We’re proud to partner with Byron Allen on a new business and programming model for late night that proactively addresses a network daypart that was cost prohibitive to continue. With this ‘time buy’ model, we have shifted an hour that was losing roughly $40 million annually to $15 million in profit—a $55 million swing.”
CBS Statement
That’s a tidy number—and, on the surface, a persuasive one that enables the network to wave away the fact that Allen’s Comics Unleashed opened far below Colbert’s Late Show in the national ratings.
In effect, the network is saying don’t measure Comics Unleashed by the ratings, judge it by the balance sheet.
But the numbers being shared by the network raise a larger question: what exactly is being counted, what’s being left out, and how much can ratings really be separated from the economics of a commercial broadcast network?
CBS has not publicly broken down how it arrived at the $40 million annual loss figure for The Late Show. The network’s statement does not say whether that calculation includes only the direct cost of producing the show against national advertising revenue, or whether it accounts for other forms of value a No. 1 late-night franchise provided CBS and its affiliates.
That distinction is not academic. Network late night has never existed in a vacuum. The shows generate national ad sales, yes, but they also sit inside a broader broadcast ecosystem that includes affiliate fees, local advertising, tune-in for the late local news, and viewing habits that can carry into the next daypart.
If Comics Unleashed continues to draw a smaller audience than The Late Show, local stations will have less audience to sell around the hour. If CBS affiliates are being compensated in some other way for the change—perhaps in the form of a reduced affiliate fee—that too would play a part in the broader economics of the decision. And if viewers switch to NBC or ABC at 11:35, those habits could matter beyond the late-night hour itself.
The central question is not whether a time-buy model can make CBS’ 11:35 hour immediately more profitable. By CBS’ own accounting, it can. The question is whether the company’s $55 million swing captures the full cost and value of exiting the traditional late-night business.
There is a real argument that the traditional model no longer works. Late-night audiences have declined across the board, production costs remain high, and the online clips that drive cultural conversation are difficult for networks to monetize at the same scale as linear advertising.
But the ratings still matter, even if they matter differently. They matter to affiliates. They matter to advertisers. And losing viewers in one time period makes it that much harder to get them back in the next.
CBS’ math is persuasive on its own terms. The question is whether those are the only terms that matter.
Get stories like this in your inbox: Sign up for LateNighter’s free daily newsletter.
To me the greatest debate there is whether TV networks are viable as a business. We can debate about the costs of producing these late shows, on the other hand not having something to keep viewers (Even if those viewers are old) tuned in at late evening will only reenforce a death spiral.
And those shows can also be handy to help their studio to promote movies.